2022 IDSOG Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, 4-6 August 2022

This journal issue includes s of papers presented at the conference. Topics discusses are: stillbirth during a pandemic;analysis of the female genital tract (FGT) metabolome;effectiveness of REGEN-COV antibody combination to reduce risk of hospitalization;patterns of nucleic acid amplification testing;delta variant neutralizing antibody response following maternal COVID19 vaccination;integrated prenatal and hepatitis c virus care increases linkage;extended interval gentamicin dosing in obstetrics;maternal and infant cytomegalovirus detection among women living with HIV.

Distribution and drug resistance analysis of pathogenic bacteria in a hospital blood culture, 2018-2022

Objective: To analyze the distribution and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria in blood culture specimens of patients with bloodstream infections before and after COVID-19 (2018-2019 and 2020-2021), and to provide scientific basis and reference for rational treatment and effective control of bloodstream infections in the post-epidemic period. Methods: Blood culture specimens were collected from patients in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University in the two years before and after the COVID-19 outbreak (2018-2021). The Automated Blood Culture Systems were used to perform blood culture on blood specimens sent for clinical inspection, and the Vitek MS automatic bacterial identification mass spectrometer was used for strain identification and the Vitek 2 automatic bacterial drug susceptibility analyzer was used for drug susceptibility testing and drug resistance analysis. Results: Blood culture specimens were performed on 28 736 patients with suspected bloodstream infection submitted for inspection from January 2018 to December 2019, and a total of 2 181 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected after removing duplicate strains, with a positive rate of 7.69%, including 1 046 strains of Gram-negative bacteria, accounting for 47.96%. From January 2020 to December 2021, blood culture specimens from 26 083 patients with suspected bloodstream infection were submitted for inspection, and a total of 2 111 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected after excluding duplicate strains, with a positive rate of 8.09%, including 1 000 strains of Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 47.37%. The drug resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae was relatively serious, and the sensitivity rate to ertapenem, polymyxin B and tigecycline was more than 90%. The main non-fermentative bacteria Acinetobacter baumannii was more than 50% sensitive to piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin and polymyxin B. The sensitivity rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, piperacillin and meropenem were more than 50%. Conclusions: In the two years before and after COVID-19, there are many types of pathogenic bacteria in bloodstream infection, but the distribution do not differ significantly. The pathogens of bloodstream infection are mainly distributed in ICU, hepatobiliary research institute, and nephrology department. Among them, Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii are the main ones, and different pathogens showed great differences in drug resistance.

Clinical profile of hospitalized spanish patients allergic to antibiotics

Background: Only between 1% and 10% of patients labelled of penicillin allergy are allergic. The negative events associated with this condition include risk of antimicrobial treatment failure, antimicrobial resistance, side-effects from use of a broader spectrum antibiotic, and increased healthcare costs. Our objective was to know the clinical profile of hospitalized allergic patients to estimate the future need for an allergy study. Method(s): We collected data from 15 Spanish hospitals about hospitalized patients labelled as allergic to antibiotics in February 2020 and October 2020 (one-month sample) outside the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic. Result(s): 620 patients were collected, 59% women. Mean age 70.6 years (3-103). 416 patients were labelled as allergic to beta-lactams (105 aminopenicillins, 18 cephalosporins, 4 carbapenems). 41 to aminoglycosides, 26 to macrolides, 55 to quinolones and 4 to glycopeptides. The causes of hospitalization were: Respiratory infection 221 (35.6%), abdominal infection 95 (15.3%), orthopaedic surgery 58 (9.4%), urine infections 57 (9.2%), skin infections 51 (8.2%), gynaecological/ obstetric pathology 21 (3.4%) Only 163 patients (26%) had previously received a clinical allergy work-up. 70 confirmed allergy to antibiotics, however the rest 93 (74%) were not delabelled. Patients received alone or combined alternative antibiotics: 79 glycopeptides, 49 aminoglycosides, 28 macrolides, 254 quinolones, 205 beta-lactams (102 cephalosporins, 41 carbapenems and 57 aminopenicillins). 74 patients (12%) would need an immediate allergic study in order to receive first-line antibiotic, but it was only really done in 38 (6.1%). The studied antibiotics were: 15 carbapenems, 10 ceftriaxone, and others not specified. Of the 416 patients labeled as allergic to beta-lactams, 150 (36%) received beta-lactam antibiotics despite the warning in their clinical reports. Conclusion(s): Allergy to beta-lactams remains the most frequent diagnosis of allergy to antibiotics and implies treatment with second-line antibiotics. Respiratory, trauma, digestive and urinary infections are the main causes of the use of antibiotics in hospitalized patients. The underlying diseases could be a risk factor for antibiotic requirements. Some patients received beta-Lactams despite the alert with a potential risk of an allergic reaction and legal implications. The promptly allergological study would imply an improvement in the use of more specific antibiotics with a good level of security.

Real-life antimicrobial therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (preliminary results and recommendations).

Objective. Development of local clinical protocols for antibacterial therapy of COVID-19-associated bacterial pneumonia in the therapeutic department of the city clinical hospital based on an analysis of the treatment process in patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of 1382 cases of hospitalization in the therapeutic department of patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia for the period from 2020 to 2021 was carried out. The structure of etiotropic therapy, the frequency and timing of microbiological studies of the biomaterial, the manifestations of the main markers of bacterial infection during dynamic monitoring of clinical and laboratory parameters in patients prescribed antibiotic therapy, as well as statistics of the stay of patients in the therapeutic department of the hospital were assessed. Based on the results obtained in the course of microbiological studies, an assessment was made of the microbial landscape of the lower respiratory tract of patients with an analysis of the sensitivity of strains of the leading microflora to a wide range of antibiotics. Results. The study found that the dominant flora in COVID-19-associated pneumonia in hospitalized patients was gram-negative bacteria - K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii - their proportion was more than 50%. Among K. pneumoniae strains, 89.4% were ESBL producers, 63.5% of the strains were resistant to carbapenems, which with a high probability allows them to be considered carbapenemase-producing strains. Among the strains of P. aeruginosa, the proportion of strains resistant to carbapenems and with a high degree of probability being strains - producers of carbapenemase was 41.1%. Among strains of Acinetobacter spp. these were 76.4%, and associated resistance to fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides was also demonstrated. Gram-positive microorganisms were found in 34.3% of cases and were mainly represented by strains of S. aureus (74.9%), only 26.4% of strains of this pathogen were methicillin-resistant. Conclusions. Microbiological monitoring conducted in 2020-2021 revealed the presence, among the pathogens of viral-bacterial pneumonia, at an early stage of hospitalization, a significant proportion of gram-negative bacteria with resistance of the MDR and XDR types. Based on the obtained microbiological data, starting empirical schemes for antibacterial therapy of secondary viral and bacterial pneumonia, which complicated the course of a new coronavirus infection COVID-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, were developed and proposed.Copyright © 2022, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Acute Diarrhea in Adults

Acute diarrheal disease accounts for 179 million outpatient visits annually in the United States. Diarrhea can be categorized as inflammatory or noninflammatory, and both types have infectious and noninfectious causes. Infectious noninflammatory diarrhea is often viral in etiology and is the most common presentation;however, bacterial causes are also common and may be related to travel or foodborne illness. History for patients with acute diarrhea should include onset and frequency of symptoms, stool character, a focused review of systems including fever and other symptoms, and evaluation of exposures and risk factors. The physical examination should include evaluation for signs of dehydration, sepsis, or potential surgical processes. Most episodes of acute diarrhea in countries with adequate food and water sanitation are uncomplicated and self-limited, requiring only an initial evaluation and supportive treatment. Additional diagnostic evaluation and management may be warranted when diarrhea is bloody or mucoid or when risk factors are present, including immunocompromise or recent hospitalization. Unless an outbreak is suspected, molecular studies are preferred over traditional stool cultures. In all cases, management begins with replacing water, electrolytes, and nutrients. Oral rehydration is preferred;however, signs of severe dehydration or sepsis warrant intravenous rehydration. Antidiarrheal agents can be symptomatic therapy for acute watery diarrhea and can help decrease inappropriate antibiotic use. Empiric antibiotics are rarely warranted, except in sepsis and some cases of travelers' or inflammatory diarrhea. Targeted antibiotic therapy may be appropriate following microbiologic stool assessment. Hand hygiene, personal protective equipment, and food and water safety measures are integral to preventing infectious diarrheal illnesses.Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Family Physicians.

Characterization and antibiogram study of pneumonia causing bacteria isolated from blood culture of children in northern Bangladesh

Children are usually affected by pneumonia, which is a common ailment caused by Pathogenic Streptococcus pneumoniae. This study's objective was to isolate and identify S. pneumoniae, which was recovered from blood samples of suspected paediatric pneumonia patients using conventional techniques, such as antibiotic sensitivity profiles and molecular approaches. In this study, forty (40) samples from three major hospitals in the Dinajpur region of Bangladesh were collected and assessed using various bacteriological, biochemical, antibiotic susceptibility test, and molecular techniques. 37.5% of the 40 samples tested positive for pneumonia, and 15 isolates were discovered. In terms of age, pneumonia was more common in children aged 3-5 years (50%) than in those aged 6 to 8 (33.33%), 9 to 11 (25%) and 12 to 15 (20%). According to the results of the current study, the study area had no statistically significant impact (P > 0.05), while age and socioeconomic status had a significant impact on the prevalence of pneumonia in patients with pneumonia (P 0.05). The age group for which pneumonia was most prevalent (at 50%) was that for children between the ages of 3-5. Poor socioeconomic status was associated with the highest prevalence of pneumonia (54.54%). By sequencing the 16S rRNA gene, S. pneumoniae was identified as S. pneumoniae NBRC102642. In the antibiotic investigation, S. pneumoniae was found to be extremely resistant to ciprofloxacin, amikacin, vancomycin, and cefexime, but responsive to erythromycin and azithromycin, as well as neomycin, kanamycin, streptomycin, and bacitracin. S. pneumoniae causes serious complications in paediatric patients, and this scenario requires prevention through vaccination and the development of new, efficient antibiotic therapies for pneumonia. If specific laboratory features of paediatric patients with pneumonia are understood, sepsis will be easier to detect early, treat, and reduce mortality.

TULAREMIA PRESENTING AS LARGE GI ULCERATION AND HEMORRHAGE

SESSION TITLE: Critical Care Infections SESSION TYPE: Case Reports PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 09:15 am - 10:15 am INTRODUCTION: Francisella tularensis is a zoonotic disease by an aerobic, gram negative coccobacillus. It is transmitted by exposure to infected animal or vectors in individuals who landscape or camp. Common symptoms are fever, chills, anorexia, and headache. Abdominal tularemia can present with abdominal pain, emesis, diarrhea, and rarely intestinal ulceration and hemorrhage. It is treated with aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones and tetracycline. CASE PRESENTATION: 38-year-old male presented with fever, cough, anorexia, and black stool for 5 days. Patient worked as a landscaper. He has no pets, travel history or sick contacts. He does not take any medications at home. Physical exam was significant for sinus tachycardia and rhonchi of right upper lobe. Significant labs include WBC of 9.8 with 41% bands, hemoglobin 15.5, sodium 125, procalcitonin 27.3, and lactic acid 1.8. COVID-19, MRSA, Legionella and Pneumococcal urine antigen were negative. CTA chest revealed mass-like opacity in right upper lobe with multiple bilateral pulmonary nodules. Lower respiratory culture showed Candida albicans. Patient was empirically started on ceftriaxone and azithromycin. He was transferred to intensive care for worsening respiratory status and was placed on non-invasive ventilation on hospital day 1. Antibiotics were broadened to ceftaroline and levofloxacin due to suspicion of tularemia. Amphotericin B was added. Labs for Histoplasma, Blastomyces, TB, Leptospira, and HIV were negative. Patient then suffered a cardiac arrest on hospital day 2 after having large brown secretions pouring from his mouth. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated and patient was intubated and started on vasopressors with return of spontaneous circulation. Massive blood transfusion protocol was initiated. Emergent bedside upper endoscopy showed large blood clot adherent to duodenal ulcer. Interventional radiology planned on performing gastric duodenal artery embolization. However, patient suffered two more cardiac arrest with resuscitation efforts terminated per family request. Karius Digital Culture later was positive for Francisella tularensis. Autopsy revealed diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, hilar lymphadenopathy, and perforated duodenal ulceration with large adherent clot. DISCUSSION: Gastrointestinal tularemia is rare and usually from drinking contaminated water or oral inoculation of bacteria. Intestinal tract involvement can present with mesenteric lymphadenopathy and ulcerative lesions resulting in gastrointestinal bleeding with case fatality rate of 50%. Even though this is noted in the literature, to our knowledge no case reports have been published. CONCLUSIONS: Careful history taking and early identification of risk factors are important when severe tularemia infection is suspected such as in individuals with extensive outdoor activities. Treatment should be empirically initiated in high risk patients. Reference #1: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585636/ Reference #2: https://casereports.bmj.com/content/2017/bcr-2017-22125. Reference #3: Altman GB, Wachs JE. Tularemia: A pathogen in nature and a biological weapon. Aaohn Journal. 2002 Aug;50(8):373-9. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Maria Haider Baig

UNDERSTANDING THE NEED FOR A BROAD DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS: A CASE OF PNEUMONIC TULAREMIA

SESSION TITLE: Disseminated Bacterial Infections SESSION TYPE: Rapid Fire Case Reports PRESENTED ON: 10/18/2022 10:15 am - 11:10 am INTRODUCTION: Tularemia is a rare infectious disease caused by Francisella Tularensis that typically affects the skin, eyes, lymph nodes, and lungs. There are a variety of forms of tularemia with varying rates of contagiousness and mortality. Respiratory tularemia has a high mortality rate if left untreated and presents with non-specific viral like symptoms occurring in conjunction with respiratory symptoms: cough, hemoptysis, and pleuritic chest pain. In this COVID ARDS era, it is important to evaluate a broad differential diagnosis. Therefore, the authors describe a patient presenting with flu-like respiratory symptoms whom was ultimately was diagnosed with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to F. Tulerensis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 44-year-old male presented with a four-day history of night sweats, shortness of breath, a productive cough which progressed to hemoptysis, and oliguria. Prior to admission, his initial symptoms were treated as chronic sinusitis with varied antibiotics. Social history including tobacco abuse and deer hunting 1 month prior to presentation. Vitals were stable except for tachycardia, hypoxia, and tachypnea. Laboratory findings were significant for AKI, lactic acidosis, mild transaminitis, hyperbilirubinemia, and leukocytosis with predominant neutrophilia. Thoracic CTA showed bilateral diffused pulmonary edema without evidence of pulmonary embolism. Due to the patient's worsening respiratory status, he was intubated for support. The patient progressed to Severe ARDS per Berlin Criteria eventually requiring pronation and continuous paralyzing. Bronchoscopy was performed with bronchial lavage. Bacterial, viral, and fungal cultures did not show growth while vasculitic work-up was negative. Empiric antibiotic treatment did not show improvement until the patient was diagnosed with F. Taularensis via serological testing with an IgM of 20 U/mL, and patient was transitioned to gentamycin. Ultimately, the patient was extubated, transitioned to oral doxycycline, and discharged home. DISCUSSION: Approximately 250 cases of tularemia are reported to CDC each year. Respiratory tularemia has a mortality rate up to 30% if not treated. For this reason, F. tularensis is a potential biological weapon and is categorized as a Group A pathogenic agent. Serological testing may be negative early in disease progression;therefore, early inflammatory markers with clinical suspicion are essential to diagnose the disease early in its course. DNA microarray has high specificity and sensitivity for rapid diagnosis of tularemia while being cost effective. After prompt diagnosis, intravenous aminoglycosides;such as gentamycin or streptomycin;must be started. CONCLUSIONS: In the above case, we illustrate the gradual onset and rapid patient deterioration when treatment is delayed;yet, there is rapid recovery once appropriate treatment is used. Reference #1: 1. Ranjbar, Reza, Payam Behzadi, and Caterina Mammina. "Respiratory tularemia: Francisella tularensis and microarray probe designing.” The open microbiology journal 10 (2016): 176. Reference #2: 2. Akhvlediani, N., I. Burjanadze, D. Baliashvili, T. Tushishvili, M. Broladze, A. Navdarashvili, S. Dolbadze et al. "Tularemia transmission to humans: a multifaceted surveillance approach.” Epidemiology & Infection 146, no. 16 (2018): 2139-2145. Reference #3: 3. Tularemia in British Columbia: A case report and review. Issue: BCMJ, vol. 52, No. 6, July August 2010 (Pages 303- 307). Megan Isaac-Renton, BSc, Muhammad Morshed, PhD, SCCM Eleni Galanis, MD, MPH, FRCPC Sunny Mak, MSc Vicente Loyola, MD, FRCPC, Linda M.N. Hoang, MD, MHSc, FRCPC DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Munish Adhikari No relevant relationships by Ashma Ul Husna No relevant relationships by Yan Jiang No relevant relationships by Divya Kharel No relevant relationships by Gregory Polcha

Genotyping, virulence genes and drug resistance of MRSA strains isolated from skin and soft tissue infection in Tianjin

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and analyze the genotyping, virulence genes and drug-resistant genes of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from skin and soft tissue infections in this area. METHODS: The skin secretions of 204 patients with skin and soft tissue infections in the Fifth Central Hospital of Tianjin between Jan. 2019 and Dec. 2020 were collected, and MRSA strains identified as non-repetitive strains were isolated. The Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) and Staphylococcal protein A gene (spa) genotyping and Panton-valentine leukocidin (PVL) gene carrying status were analyzed among the MRSA strains, and their relationship with drug resistance was analyzed. RESULTS: Totally 82 strains of S. aureus were isolated from the skin secretions of 204 patients with skin and soft tissue infections, including 44 strains of MRSA (53.66%). The most common SCCmec genotype was genotype III (accounting for 84.09%) and the most common spa genotype was genotype t030 (accounting for 84.09%). PVL genes encoding virulence factors were amplified in 5 strains (11.36%). The drug resistance rates of 44 MRSA strains to vancomycin and compound sulfamethoxazole were 0.00%, and all the strains were drug-resistant to penicillin. Different SCCmec and spa genotypes were highly resistant to erythromycin, cefazolin, clindamycin and levofloxacin, but the differences in drug resistance rates of different SCCmec genotypes to clindamycin and levofloxacin were significant (P < 0.05). The resistance rates of strains with PVL positive genes to chloramphenicol, gentamicin and tetracycline were significantly higher than those with PVL negative genes (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Strains carrying SCCmec III and spa t030 genotypes may be the dominant strains of MRSA in skin and soft tissue infections in this area. Spa genotypes and PVL gene have certain impact on drug resistance of MRSA, and the isolated MRSA strains are all sensitive to vancomycin and compound sulfamethoxazole, which can provide a reference for anti-MRSA treatment in this area.

Implementing tablet-based ototoxicity screening in adults with cystic fibrosis

Introduction: People with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) regularly receive antibiotics for treatment of lung infections, which can include intravenous aminoglycosides (IVAG) resulting in potential ototoxicity. Sound booth audiometry is costly, time-consuming, and requires further outpatient visits and audiologists. A quality improvement project delivered by specialist pharmacists to implement a tablet audiometry ototoxicity monitoring programme was launched in PwCF receiving IVAG therapy. Objectives: To implement a tablet ototoxicity screening programme in adults with CF. Methods: PwCF receiving IVAG completed tablet-based audiometry (0.25– 16 kHz) (Shoebox MD) alongside validated ototoxicity questionnaires at the beginning and end of treatment. Following a clinical pathway, clinicians undertook shared decision-making processes regarding continuation of AG if abnormality was detected, alongside referral for sound-booth audiometry. Results: Data were collected from April–Dec 2021. Thirty-eight patients (median [IQR] age 28.5 ([15.5] years;mean [SD] ppFEV1 62.3 [26.5]) were screenedwhowere on IVAG. Fifteen patients (39%)were referred for formal audiometry due to abnormal baseline results, of which 5 had symptoms of hearing loss identified through questionnaires. 3% (1/38) stopped AG therapy due to identified potential ototoxic risk. Twenty-two patients received screening at beginning and end of IVAG therapy: significant ototoxic effects were seen in 2 of these patients (9%);20 patients (91%) had no significant change from baseline audiometry. Conclusions: We present pilot results to show feasibility of tablet-based ototoxicity screening. More IV courses were completed at home than anticipated (due to Covid19) limiting end of IV testing. Further 3-month testing is planned to detect potential delayed ototoxic change. Nevertheless, our results show tablet audiometry to be an effective and practical screening tool used by non-audiologists for accurate, early identification of hearing loss and ototoxicity.

RESISTANCE FACTORS OF KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE BACTERIA DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae bacterial strains producing extended range of beta-lactamases or carbapenemases are of serious clinical concern. The aim of the study was to determine the resistance factors of K. pneumoniae strains isolated from the lower respiratory tract of patients diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods. The study of resistance to antimicrobial drugs included 138 strains of K. pneumoniae isolated from the sputum of patients treated in infectious diseases monohospitals in the city of Tyumen and the Tyumen region within the period from May 2020 to June 2021. Among the strains examined, 51.4% of them were isolated from SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. The presence of resistance genes was determined by PCR in 71 strains of K. pneumoniae (34 strains from COVID-19-positive and 37 strains from COVID-19-negative patients). Identification of isolated bacterial strains was carried out according to the protein spectra by using a desktop time-of-flight mass spectrometer with matrix laser desorption MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker, Germany). The belonging of the strains to the hypermucoid phenotype was determined using the string test. Sensitivity to antimicrobial drugs was assessed in the disk diffusion method on Muller-Hinton medium. The sensitivity of culture strains to bacteriophage preparations was determined by the drop method (spot-test). In the study, we used “Polyvalent Sextaphage Pyobacteriophage” and “Purified Polyvalent Klebsiella Bacteriophage”, JSC NPO Microgen, Russia. Detection of resistance genes to beta-lactam antibiotics by real-time PCR was carried out using the BakRezista kit (OOO DNA-technology, Russia). The results of the study evidence that K. pneumoniae bacteria isolated from COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia displayed a high resistance to antimicrobial drugs and commercial phage-containing drugs. Resistance of K. pneumoniae strains was recorded from 50% (to aminoglycosides and carbapenems) to 90% (to inhibitor-protected penicillins). Sensitivity to bacteriophages was noted on average in no more than 20% of strains. It is important to emphasize that strains isolated from COVID-19-positive patients more often showed a hypermucoid phenotype, suggesting a high bacterial virulence, and also showed greater resistance to all groups of antibacterial drugs examined in the study, which is confirmed by the presence of resistance genes of the ESBL group and carbapenemase. The results of the study suggest that the high level of resistance of K. pneumoniae strains isolated from COVID-19-positive patients is associated with immunosuppression provoked by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which contributes to their colonization by more virulent strains.

Acinetobacter baumannii strains grown in endotracheal aspirate culture in Samsun Bafra State Hospital intensive care units and the effect of COVID-19 on Acinetobacter baumannii strains (2019-2020)

INTRODUCTION: Acinetobacter baumannii is an important causative agent of ventilation-associated pneumonia capable of long-term survival in the hospital setting. Increasing resistance to antibiotics effective against this pathogen is of concern. In this study, the antibiotic resistance profiles of A. baumannii strains grown in endotracheal aspirate (ETA) cultures in intensive care units and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the resistance profiles in our province where the highest number of cases were observed in our country for a long time were investigated. METHODS: Our study included 74 A. baumannii isolates isolated from ETA samples that was sent to our laboratory from the intensive care units of Bafra State Hospital between January 2019 and December 2020. Bacteria were identified using conventional methods and a semi automatic bacterial identification system Vitek-2 (bioMerieux, France). The antibiotic susceptibility tests of the isolated strains were studied in accordance with the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) standards. Antibiotic susceptibility of A. baumannii strains was tested with Vitek-2 system. RESULTS: The mean age and standard deviations of 18 patients before the COVID-19 pandemic and 56 patients after the pandemic were found to be 83.0 +or- 8.3 and 70.5 +or- 14.9 (p < 0.001), respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the distributions of gender by years (p=0.025). While 55.6% of the patients were female in 2019, 73.2% of the patients in 2020 were male. There was no difference between the two periods in terms of death rates (p=0.628) and respiratory support needs (p=0.191). It was determined that the pandemic increased the number of isolated A. baumannii by 311%. For the two periods, resistance was greatest for piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin and against imipenem. Examinig the two periods, amikacin resistance was seen to a lesser extent in 2020. A statistically significant difference was found between tigecycline resistance rates according to years (p < 0.001). While the tigecycline susceptibility of strains was 88.9% in 2019, it was found to be 26.8% in 2020.11.1% of the strains in 2019 and 64.3% in 2020 were found to be moderately susceptible. In this study, colistin resistance was observed in one (1.4%) of all isolates, while tigecycline resistance was detected in five isolates (6.8%). One isolate (1.4%) was susceptible to all antibiotics except ceftazidime. When the multi-antibiotic resistance of 73 A. baumannii isolates was examined, multidrug resistant (MDR) was 22.9% (n: 17), extensive drug resistance (XDR) was 74.3% (n: 55), pandrug resistance (PDR) was 1.4% (n: 1). Although there was a statistical difference in amikacin, meropenem and tigecycline resistances before and after the pandemic, no difference was found between the resistance patterns (p=0.281). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: It has been observed that the most effective antibiotics against A. baumannii are colistin and tigecycline. It was determined that the COVID-19 pandemic did not change the resistance pattern rates. It is thought that success in fighting this infection will increase when each hospital determines its own resistance patterns, updates empirical treatment protocols based on their results, and clinicians use appropriate antibiotics early.

Effectiveness of anti-TB medicines in treating patients experiencing COVID-19 symptoms

Introduction: COVID-19, the life-threatening disease caused by the pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 virus, has limited treatment or measures for curing the infected persons. However, many antibiotics have been tried with varied results.

Aminoglycoside-Induced Ototoxicity: Test Before You Treat?

COMMENTARY Aminoglycoside-induced deafness is discussed in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) website as condition 580000.1 The ototoxicity is not dose-related and was reported with the use of streptomycin for tuberculosis in Africa during the second half of the 20th century.1 Maternal transmission of risk was identified, and affected kindreds were characterized in China and the Middle East.1 A thorough literature review revealed that the A1555G mutation is most common and that a related mutation C1494T results in similarly affected patients;14 patients with other mutations also have been identified.2 The two most common mutations usually are seen in individuals of Chinese ancestry.2 Ding and colleagues reported successful testing for the mitochondrial mutations conferring risk of ototoxicity with aminoglycoside use, but the rapidity of result availability was not explicitly described.3 The various steps of their assay require approximately 15 minutes, but they did not describe the duration of intervening cooling phases,3 and it is not known if their assay would yield results rapidly enough to alter treatment in individuals who need life-saving antimicrobial therapy. A Chinese study of one family over three generations suggested that children carrying the mitochondrial mutation who received an aminoglycoside at younger ages were more susceptible to more profound hearing loss than were children treated with an aminoglycoside later in childhood.4 Thus, initial implementation of testing could, indeed, be targeted in neonatal and pediatric settings. Knowing that one of each 500 individuals treated with an aminoglycoside is at risk of profound hearing loss (separate from the renal and ocular toxicity that can be largely prevented by checking levels and adjusting doses to keep trough levels below a range of potential toxicity), one wonders if testing for the relevant mitochondrial mutations will be required one day before allowing aminoglycoside treatment. 1.

Outbreak of Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Tertiary Healthcare System in Detroit

Background. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most common causes of healthcare-associated infections in critically ill patients and those with suboptimal immunity. However, the development of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR Pa) creates an even great disease burden and threat to both the hospital and local community health. The purpose of this study is to illustrate a descriptive analysis of a cluster of MDR Pseudomonas, during a local surge of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID 19) pandemic. The goal is to shed more light on the troublesome parallel during outbreaks, such as COVID-19 and consequential secondary outcomes. Methods. From November 2020 through February 2021, 16 patients exposed to the intensive care units of a tertiary healthcare system were infected or colonized with a multidrug-resistant strain of P. aeruginosa (Figure 1). Outbreak investigation was conducted via retrospective chart review of the first eight cases and prospective analysis of the latter eight cases. The isolates collected prospectively were analyzed for taxonomic identification, antimicrobial resistance profile, and phylogenetic analysis. Clinical characteristics of all patients were collected, and epidemiological investigation was carried out. MDR is defined as resistance to at least four classes of antibiotics: third-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and carbapenems. Results. Of the 16 cases of MDR Pa infections, seven died within five months (Table 1). Antimicrobial resistance gene profiling detected blaOXA and blaPAO betalactamase genes in all the samples. One sample contained an additional blaVIM resistance gene, although this patient was colonized and not actively infected. The analysis suggests existence of two clusters demonstrating relatedness and possible horizontal transmission. Timing of this cluster of cases coincides with surge of COVID-19 cases. This highlights the importance of infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship. Conclusion. Since early 2017 studies show there is a growing prevalence worldwide in transferable resistance, particularly for β-lactamases and carbapenemases, MDR Pseudomonas. This study emphasizes an irony paralleled during a pandemic, the needed efforts to prevent unintentional lapses in patient safety.

Melioidosis: A Neglected Infection in Bangladesh

Bangladesh is an example of a highly populous, agricultural country where melioidosis may be a significantly under diagnosed cause of infection and death. A recent regression model predicted 16,931 cases annually in Bangladesh with a mortality rate of 56%. However, we only manage to confirm (culture) around 80 cases in last 60 years. A lack of awareness among microbiologists and clinicians and a lack of diagnostic microbiology infrastructure are factors that are likely to lead to the underreporting of melioidosis. Melioidosis transmits through inoculation, inhalation and ingestion. Diabetes mellitus is the most common risk factor (12 times higher chance of getting the infection) predisposing individuals to melioidosis and is present in >50% of all patients. The clinical presentation is widely varied and can be mistaken for other diseases such as tuberculosis or more common forms of pneumonia giving rise to its nickname as the “great mimicker”. Disease manifestations vary from pneumonia or localized abscess to acute septicemias, or may present as a chronic infection. Culture is considered the current gold-standard for diagnosis and culture-confirmation should always be sought in patients where disease is suspected. It is strongly recommended that any non–Pseudomonas aeruginosa, oxidase-positive, Gram-negative bacillus isolated from any clinical specimen from a patient in an endemic area should be suspected to be Burkholderia pseudomallei (BP). In addition, based on antibiogram, any Gramnegative bacilli that are oxidase-positive, typically resistant to aminoglycosides (e.g., gentamicin), colistin, and polymyxin but sensitive to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid should be considered as BP. This bacteria is inherently resistant to penicillin, ampicillin, first generation and second-generation cephalosporins, gentamicin, tobramycin, streptomycin, and polymyxin. For intensive phase (10 to 14 days), ceftazidime or carbapenem is the drug of choice. For eradication phase (3 to 6 months), oral trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole is the drug of choice. Surgery (drainage of abscess) has an important role in the management of melioidosis. Preventive measures through protective gears could be useful particularly for the risk groups.

Treatment and prevention of community-acquired bacterial meningitis

Bacterial meningitis is a serious infection that requires immediate treatment. Recommended empiric antimicrobial therapy is based upon the most likely pathogen, according to a patient’s age and immune status. Antimicrobial therapy should be modified after identification of the causative microorganism and results of susceptibility tests. Preventive measures include the use of vaccines that target Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae, as well as the use of chemoprophylaxis in selected situations. Pharmacists are in a key position to recommend appropriate antimicrobial therapy for the treatment and prophylaxis of bacterial meningitis and to ensure that patients are receiving recommended vaccinations.

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of respiratory Gram-negative bacterial isolates from COVID-19 patients in Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial superinfections associated with COVID-19 are common in ventilated ICU patients and impact morbidity and lethality. However, the contribution of antimicrobial resistance to the manifestation of bacterial infections in these patients has yet to be elucidated. METHODS: We collected 70 Gram-negative bacterial strains, isolated from the lower respiratory tract of ventilated COVID-19 patients in Zurich, Switzerland between March and May 2020. Species identification was performed using MALDI-TOF; antibiotic susceptibility profiles were determined by EUCAST disk diffusion and CLSI broth microdilution assays. Selected Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (46%) and Enterobacterales (36%) comprised the two largest etiologic groups. Drug resistance in P. aeruginosa isolates was high for piperacillin/tazobactam (65.6%), cefepime (56.3%), ceftazidime (46.9%) and meropenem (50.0%). Enterobacterales isolates showed slightly lower levels of resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam (32%), ceftriaxone (32%), and ceftazidime (36%). All P. aeruginosa isolates and 96% of Enterobacterales isolates were susceptible to aminoglycosides, with apramycin found to provide best-in-class coverage. Genotypic analysis of consecutive P. aeruginosa isolates in one patient revealed a frameshift mutation in the transcriptional regulator nalC that coincided with a phenotypic shift in susceptibility to ß-lactams and quinolones. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable levels of antimicrobial resistance may have contributed to the manifestation of bacterial superinfections in ventilated COVID-19 patients, and may in some cases mandate consecutive adaptation of antibiotic therapy. High susceptibility to amikacin and apramycin suggests that aminoglycosides may remain an effective second-line treatment of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, provided efficacious drug exposure in lungs can be achieved.